Comments on: System.IO.Path.Combine() http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/ Randomised nonsense. Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:04:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Comment on System.IO.Path.Combine() by Russell Mull http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/comment-page-1/#comment-30278 Comment on System.IO.Path.Combine() by Russell Mull Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:11:49 +0000 http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/#comment-30278 [...] This is the cached version of http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/#comment-27350 We are neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content. Comment on System.IO.Path.Combine() by Russell Mull [...] [...] This is the cached version of http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/#comment-27350 We are neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content. Comment on System.IO.Path.Combine() by Russell Mull [...]

]]> By: gringod http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/comment-page-1/#comment-27366 gringod Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:50:34 +0000 http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/#comment-27366 There are so many things like that throughout the .Net framework. I know there are many people out there that think that Java is much better, and maybe it is, but I personally prefer .Net. There are so many things like that throughout the .Net framework. I know there are many people out there that think that Java is much better, and maybe it is, but I personally prefer .Net.

]]> By: Russell Mull http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/comment-page-1/#comment-27350 Russell Mull Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:41:06 +0000 http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/#comment-27350 Pet peeve: WHY doesn't Path.Combine take a variable argument list? There's no good reason. I have my own version in a util library that does, and it's much cleaner. (I could say the same thing about collection constructors as well... the literal initialization syntax leaves a lot to be desired.) Pet peeve: WHY doesn’t Path.Combine take a variable argument list? There’s no good reason. I have my own version in a util library that does, and it’s much cleaner.

(I could say the same thing about collection constructors as well… the literal initialization syntax leaves a lot to be desired.)

]]> By: gringod http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/comment-page-1/#comment-27297 gringod Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:06:43 +0000 http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/#comment-27297 Ok, maybe "wonderful" is a bit OTT. But it's a darn sight better than some of the code I've seen in the past. Ok, maybe “wonderful” is a bit OTT. But it’s a darn sight better than some of the code I’ve seen in the past.

]]> By: Jeff Brown http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/comment-page-1/#comment-27252 Jeff Brown Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:21:14 +0000 http://www.gringod.com/2007/10/12/systemiopathcombine/#comment-27252 I don't know about wonderful. It really pales in comparison to what Java offers. For example, there are inadequate provisions for splitting or normalizing paths. I don’t know about wonderful. It really pales in comparison to what Java offers. For example, there are inadequate provisions for splitting or normalizing paths.

]]>